Riding the Short Strangle

Logo

When the markets drift sideways and volatility feels like it’s exhaled, the Short Strangle can be a trader’s quiet companion. It’s not glamorous. It doesn’t make headlines. But when you understand it — really understand it — it becomes one of the most efficient ways to capture the time decay that underpins all options pricing.

At its core, a short strangle means selling two out-of-the-money options: one call and one put on the same underlying stock or ETF with the same expiration date. You’re betting that the stock price will stay between those two strike prices through expiration. Every day that passes without a major move in either direction works in your favor — a small but steady drip of theta.

This is a credit strategy — you’re paid upfront for the risk you take. The total premium collected represents your maximum potential profit. The risk, however, is theoretically unlimited to the upside and substantial to the downside, so position size and risk management are not optional — they’re the entire game.

The ideal time to enter a short strangle is when implied volatility (IV) is high relative to its historical range. Elevated IV means the options are expensive — you’re selling fear. As volatility contracts or time decays, those inflated premiums erode, often long before expiration. Many experienced traders will close early once they’ve captured 50–75% of the max profit rather than risk a late-stage price swing.

  • Stock trading at $100
  • Sell the $110 call
  • Sell the $90 put
  • Collect $3.50 total premium

Your profit zone? Between $86.50 and $113.50 — a wide band for a patient trader who understands probabilities.

At UpTrade, we often think of the short strangle as the “rental income” trade. It’s about collecting consistent, measured returns while respecting your exposure. It rewards discipline and punishes stubbornness.

As always, remember: a strangle doesn’t care whether the market moves up or down — only that it doesn’t move too far, too fast. In calm markets, that’s your edge. In turbulent ones, it’s your warning.

The key takeaway: You’re not predicting direction — you’re predicting stability.

The Poor Man’s Short Strangle

Logo

September 25, 2021
by Peter Seed

Reassessing Risk in Options Trading
For those of us who trade short strangles, it’s not uncommon to occasionally tap the brakes and revisit the fundamental risk-reward profiles of the core options strategy levels:

Level 1 – Long Options or Covered Calls

Level 2 – Cash-Secured Short Puts

Level 3 – Debit Spreads

Level 4 – Credit Spreads

Level 5 – Naked Options

As you move up the ladder, the potential risk exposure increases. Sometimes, it pays to take a step back and trade with more measured risk.

Introducing the “Poor Man’s Short Strangle” (PMSS)
One such lower-risk alternative is the Poor Man’s Short Strangle—a flexible strategy that can be built incrementally.

Step 1: Acquire 100 Shares
You begin by owning 100 shares of stock. This might happen by design, or you may have been assigned shares through a short put position held to expiration. Perhaps it’s simply a stock you believe in and would be comfortable accumulating further.

Step 2: Sell a Covered Call
Next, you write a short call against those 100 shares, creating a covered call position. This limits your upside, but it also caps your downside risk from the call. If the stock rises, you benefit from the gain in the share price, while also collecting the call premium.

My preferred approach is to sell calls with:

30–50 days to expiration, and

Delta between 0.15 and 0.40

Step 3: Add a Short Put
If the stock price falls more than expected, you can add a short put, effectively transforming the position into a Covered Short Strangle.

This creates three possible outcomes:

Stock Rises
→ You profit from the increase in share price up to the strike of the short call, and you keep the call premium.

Stock Trades Sideways
→ You keep both the call and put premiums as time decay works in your favor.

Stock Falls Below Put Strike
→ You may be assigned additional shares, averaging down your position—assuming you’re comfortable increasing your stake.

In all three scenarios, the trader benefits from downside protection while still retaining the potential for future gains. By collecting premium and simultaneously hedging against sharp price movements in the underlying stock, the position is both income-generating and risk-managed. 

The key takeaway is that traders with limited capital should prioritize risk-averse strategies to protect against significant losses.